acslitunit5

1. What are the structural & content differences between comedies and tragedies? What was the
purpose of such patterns in theatre scripts of this time period. And do these patterns make the
work more or less meaningful?

2. Why are most aspects of the play contrasting with one another/in conflict with one another?

3. Are there scenes or characters which are not essential? What would be your criteria for cutting
them out?

4. Does a soliloquy evoke more pity or less because of a character’s tragic flaw(s)? Do certain
characters evoke more or less pity or display more/less guilt?

5. Examine the function of the supporting and minor characters? Are they essential? What is their
dramatic function? Are they merely fools, clowns and jesters--and what purpose would that serve?

6. How does the syntax of Shakespeare's language create meaning? Consider prose vs. verse,
Iambic pentameter, imagery, figurative language, etc. In what ways can syntax shift the tone of a
scene or act? Why is it important to notice such shifts in the language? How can we derive
meaning from such shifts?

7. How is dramatic irony created? Do we have to suspend our beliefs in order for irony to work?

8. How does the "law of unintended consequences" apply to: love, relationships, situations of
conflict or anger, peer pressure, etc.? If the characters in this play followed the ACS principles of
RESPECT and INTEGRITY, what impact would it have on the plot and characters?

9. What is Shakespeare trying to telling us in his play about how people should or should not act?
Is this a timeless message?

10. Who do you think truly killed Romeo & Juliet?